Filed 22 July 2013, 16:41 IST. Every price, volume and forecast below is reproduced as published on that date and is not a current quotation. For how the benchmarks themselves are set, see how gold is priced.
Gold smuggling into India increased sharply as import duty rose, with seizures at the international airports climbing and the metal arriving concealed in baggage, in cargo and across land borders. The rise followed the duty increases directly: each rise widened the gap between the legal landed cost of gold and what it could be sold for domestically, and that gap is the entire incentive.
By the time this dispatch was filed, duty stood at 8 per cent and would reach 10 per cent within weeks, with an export-linked quota rule alongside it. The arithmetic was straightforward and did not require organised crime to explain: on a kilogram of gold, a tenth of the value is a large standing reward for avoiding a customs declaration.
Why the response was predictable
A tariff on a compact, high-value, fungible, anonymous commodity is unusually easy to evade. Gold is worth a great deal per unit of volume, is indistinguishable once melted, has no serial number, and has a liquid domestic market that will absorb any quantity without asking where it came from. Every one of those properties is why gold is valuable in the first place, and each one also makes an import duty on it difficult to enforce.
The forms the archive records are the ones any customs service would expect. Metal carried as personal baggage by frequent travellers on Gulf routes. Concealment in cargo and in machinery. Land-border movement from neighbouring countries with lower or no duty. And reclassification, importing at a different tariff line as findings, components or dore.
What the seizure figures do and do not show
They are a lower bound whose relationship to the total is unknown, and they measure enforcement effort as much as smuggling volume. A rise in seizures can reflect more smuggling, better detection, or a policy decision to concentrate resources on it, usually all three at once. So the honest reading is directional: seizures rose after each duty increase, which is consistent with the incentive but does not quantify it.
The better indicator is the premium. When the price of metal in the domestic market exceeds the legal landed cost by considerably more than the duty explains, the difference is what unofficial supply is charging, and that premium widened sharply after August 2013. The whole sequence is set out in India's gold import regime, and the wider policy file in the gold section.
Questions about this dispatch
Why did gold smuggling into India increase in 2013?
Because import duty rose from 2 per cent to 10 per cent between January 2012 and August 2013, widening the gap between the legal landed cost of gold and its domestic selling price. That gap is the incentive, and on a compact high-value commodity it is large per kilogram. Household demand did not fall correspondingly, so the difference moved through unrecorded channels.
What made gold particularly hard to tax at the border?
The same properties that make it valuable: very high value per unit volume, complete fungibility once melted, no serial numbers, and a deep domestic market that absorbs any quantity without provenance. A tariff on a commodity with those characteristics is inherently difficult to enforce.
Do seizure statistics measure how much was smuggled?
No. They are a lower bound with an unknown relationship to the total, and they reflect enforcement effort as much as volume, and a rise can indicate more smuggling, better detection, or reallocated resources. The domestic premium over the legal landed price is the more informative measure, because it shows what unofficial supply was actually charging.
This page restores an item first published on 22 July 2013, 16:41 IST at the address below. Cite the publication date rather than the date you read it: the material is a 2011 to 2016 document, and the date is what makes it meaningful.
https://www.bullionstreet.com/news/india-witnesses-spurt-in-gold-smuggling/5264