Filed 5 October 2012, 15:16 IST. Every price, volume and forecast below is reproduced as published on that date and is not a current quotation. For how the benchmarks themselves are set, see how gold is priced.
Romania renewed its long-standing claim for the return of gold reserves and historical treasure sent to Russia for safekeeping during the First World War, raising the matter at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. The consignment, moved in 1916 as the front approached Bucharest, included roughly ninety-three tonnes of the National Bank's gold together with the Pietroasele treasure and other museum holdings.
Part of the museum material was returned in the decades that followed. The bullion was not. The Romanian position through the period this archive covers was that the transfer was a deposit rather than a transfer of ownership, and that the obligation to return it survives every change of government and state on both sides since.
What was sent, and why
In late 1916, with Bucharest about to fall, the Romanian state moved its most portable assets east. Russia was then an ally, and a deposit in Moscow was the only available alternative to capture. Two consignments went: the National Bank's gold reserve and, separately, archives, art and antiquities including the Pietroasele hoard, a fourth-century Gothic goldwork find that is among the most significant objects in Romanian collections.
The following year the Russian state that had accepted the deposit ceased to exist, and the claim has been directed at each of its successors since. Some cultural material came back in 1935 and again in 1956. The bullion has not been returned, and successive Russian positions have ranged from disputing the terms to treating the matter as settled by later agreements.
Why it recurs
Claims of this kind are unusual in that they do not expire in practice, however weak they are in law. A gold reserve is fungible, well documented, and large enough to be politically useful, so a government under pressure has a standing incentive to raise it and no cost in doing so. That is why the Romanian claim has resurfaced at intervals for a century, generally at moments when relations were already difficult.
For a reader of this archive the interest is structural rather than diplomatic: it is a reminder that official gold holdings are subject to legal and political claims that no price series records. Other examples in the file include wartime holdings and restitution questions elsewhere in central Europe; see the gold section and the material on central-bank reserves.
The record
The claim survives on an asymmetry in its own paperwork. The 1916 transfer to Moscow was made openly, as a wartime safekeeping arrangement between two governments, and it is not the disputed part. The disputed part is what came back: the returns of 1935 and 1956 covered museum holdings, the Pietroasele treasure among them, and stopped there. A deposit both sides acknowledge, set against a return only one side considers complete, is a dispute that can be reopened indefinitely and settled by nobody.
Questions about this dispatch
How much gold does Romania claim from Russia?
Roughly ninety-three tonnes of National Bank reserves, sent to Moscow for safekeeping in 1916 as the front approached Bucharest, together with the Pietroasele treasure and other museum holdings. Part of the cultural material was returned in 1935 and 1956; the bullion has not been.
Why has the claim never been resolved?
Because the state that accepted the deposit ceased to exist within a year, and every subsequent position has turned on whether the 1916 transfer created a returnable deposit or was superseded by later agreements. Romania has maintained the former throughout. Neither side has an incentive to concede, and there is no forum with jurisdiction to compel either.
What is the Pietroasele treasure?
A fourth-century hoard of Gothic goldwork found in Romania in 1837, among the most significant objects in Romanian collections. It travelled with the 1916 consignment as part of the museum material rather than the bullion, and elements of it were among the items returned in the twentieth century.
This page restores an item first published on 5 October 2012, 15:16 IST at the address below. Cite the publication date rather than the date you read it: the material is a 2011 to 2016 document, and the date is what makes it meaningful.
https://www.bullionstreet.com/news/romania-wants-gold-treasure-back-from-russia/3047